Study Number: 

4034

Project Title:

Post-burn study of woody vegetation at Jacobs Branch East, 1994.

Investigator(s):

Barry Clinton  E-Mail | Tel. 828.524.2128 | Biographical Sketch
Affiliated Institution(s): USDA Forest Service
Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory
Address: Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory
3160 Coweeta Lab Road
Otto, North Carolina 28763   USA
Study Category: Regional
Project Type: Type 1
Study Period: 1994
Notes:

 

Funding Source(s):

Man and Biosphere Program, Southern Appalachian Forest Ecosystems Project, US Forest Service

Abstract: Recent declines in the yellow pine component of pine-hardwood stands in the southern Appalachian Mountains has prompted managers to increase the use of fire as a silviculture tool. The fell and burn treatment is designed to remove competing vegetation (hardwoods and mountain laurel [Kalmia latifolia]) to ensure successful establishment of planted eastern white pine (Pinus strobus). Two years after burning, mountain laurel had accumulated more biomass than any other species and accounted for 43% of total biomass in year 1 and 20% in year 2. By year 4, mountain laurel ranked fifth (8.9% of total) in total biomass among hardwood species behind Allegheny serviceberry (Amalanchier arborea, 14.3%), chestnut oak (Quercus prinus, 13.7%), red maple (Acer rubrum, 12.4%), and scarlet oak (Q. coccinea, 9.3%). Across sites, woody species richness ranged from 19-24 in year 1 and 14-22 in year 4. Species richness varied across sites and years, and there were substantial changes in the distribution of biomass among species. The introduction of fire allowed the once dominant pitch pine (P. rigida) to successfully reestablish. On sites, pine accounted for 25% of pretreatment stem density, but <1% and 2% in the first and fourth growing seasons after burning, respectively. However; in year 1, pines had increased in density 20-fold compared to pretreatment levels, and by year 4, had maintained a 17-fold increase compared to pretreatment. The use of fire in forest management has been the subject of considerable criticism. In light of current public concerns over the loss of critical or unique habitats, fire may gain public support for use as a restoration tool.
Location(s), Described: Jacobs Branch East.
Location(s), Download GPS: ArcView Shape Files (shp.):  Decimal Degrees  |  UTM, NAD83, Zone 17
Location(s), Online Map(s): Online Map
Methods/Experimental Design: Study plots were 3 meters by 3 meters each.

Site code=1=Jacobs Branch East

Woody Vegetation Codes:
3 - Acer rubrum L., Red Maple
6 - Amelanchier arborea Michaux f., Serviceberry/Sarvis
7 - Betula lenta L., Sweet/Black Birch
10 - Carya glabra (Miller), Sweet Pignut Hickory
15 - Ceanothus americanus, New Jersey Tea
16 - Cornus Florida L., Flowering Dogwood
22 - Juniperus virginiana L., Eastern Red Cedar
23 - Liriodendron tulipifera L., Yellow/Tulip Poplar
28 - Nyssa sylvatica Marshall var. sylvatica, Black Tupelo/Blackgum
30 - Oxydendron arboreum (L.) DC., Sourwood
31 - Pinus echinata Miller, Shortleaf Pine
32 - Pinus rigida Miller, Pitch Pine
33 - Pinus strobus L., Eastern White Pine
39 - Quercus coccinea Muenchh., Scarlet Oak
42 - Quercus prinus L., Chestnut Oak
43 - Quercus rubra L., Northern Red Oak
45 - Quercus velutina Lam., Black Oak
47 - Robinia pseudoacacia L., Black Locust
48 - Sassafras albidum (Nutt.) Ness, Sassafras
53 - Kalmia latifolia L., Mountain Laurel
55 - Aralia spinosa L., Devils Walkingstick
65 - Hamamelis virginiana L., Witch Hazel
67 - Ilex ambigua (Michaux)Torrey var. montana, Mountain Holly (deciduous)
75 - Rhododendron calendulaceum(Michaux) Torrey, Flame Azalea
78 - Rhus glabra L., Smooth Sumac
100 - Vitus aestivalis var.argentifolia (Munson) Fernald, Silver-leaf Grape

Stem origin codes:
0 - solitary stem
1 - multiple stem

Sampling Frequency: Variable
Data Columns:

year - year of sampling
site - coded variable for sampling site
plot - plot number of sampling site
subplot - subplot number of sampling site
species - coded variable for woody species name; codes described in Methods/Experimental Design
diameter - diameter of woody vegetation in centimeters
eclumplth - the length of evergreen clumps (clumps of mountain laurel or rhododendron)in centimeters
eclumpwth - the width of evergreen clumps (clumps of mountain laurel or rhododendron) in centimeters
eclumpht - the height of evergreen clumps (clumps of mountain laurel or rhododendron)in centimeters
stem_origin - coded variable for stem origin; codes described in Methods/Experimental Design


Missing Data Codes:
-9999

Publications:

Elliott, K.J., J.M. Vose, B.D. Clinton. 2002. Growth of eastern white pine (Pinus strobes L.) related to forest floor consumption by prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 26(1): 18-25.

Clinton, B.D., J.M. Vose, W.T. Swank. 1996. Shifts in aboveground and forest floor carbon and nitrogen pools after felling and burning in the southern Appalachians. Forest Science 42(4):431-441

Clinton, B.C., J.M. Vose. 2000. Plant succession and community restoration following felling and burning in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Pages 22-29 in W. Keith Moser and Cynthia F. Moser (eds.). Fire and Forest Ecology: innovative silviculture and vegetable management. Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference Proceedings, No.21. Tall Timbers Research Station, Talahassee, Florida, USA.

Vose. J.M., B.D. Clinton, W.T. Swank. 1993. Fire, drought, and forest management influences on pine/hardwood ecosystems in the southern Appalachians. 12th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, Oct. 26-28, Jekyll Island, Georgia, USA.

Vose, J.M., B.D. Clinton, W.T. Swank. 1993. Site preparation burning to restore pine-hardwood stands: aboveground biomass, forest floor mass, nitrogen carbon pools. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:2255-2262.

Data Restrictions: Users must adhere to the Coweeta LTER Data Policy.
Metadata: EML Format (XML Schema) | Information about EML
Data Downloads: Microsoft® Excel (.xls)
Text Comma Delimited (.csv)
DBase (.dbf)