Study Number: 

4026

Project Title:

Post-burn survey of Blazed Creek herbaceous understory plots, 1991.

Investigator(s):

Barry Clinton  E-Mail | Tel. 828.524.2128 | Biographical Sketch
Affiliated Institution(s): USDA Forest Service
Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory
Address: Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory
3160 Coweeta Lab Road
Otto, North Carolina 28763   USA
Study Category: Regional
Project Type: Type 1
Study Period: 1991
Notes:

 

Funding Source(s):

Man and Biosphere Program, Southern Appalachian Forest Ecosystems Project, US Forest Service

Abstract: Recent declines in the yellow pine component of pine-hardwood stands in the southern Appalachian Mountains has prompted managers to increase the use of fire as a silviculture tool. The fell and burn treatment is designed to remove competing vegetation (hardwoods and mountain laurel [Kalmia latifolia]) to ensure successful establishment of planted eastern white pine (Pinus strobus). Two years after burning, mountain laurel had accumulated more biomass than any other species and accounted for 43% of total biomass in year 1 and 20% in year 2. By year 4, mountain laurel ranked fifth (8.9% of total) in total biomass among hardwood species behind Allegheny serviceberry (Amalanchier arborea, 14.3%), chestnut oak (Quercus prinus, 13.7%), red maple (Acer rubrum, 12.4%), and scarlet oak (Q. coccinea, 9.3%). Across sites, woody species richness ranged from 19-24 in year 1 and 14-22 in year 4. Species richness varied across sites and years, and there were substantial changes in the distribution of biomass among species. The introduction of fire allowed the once dominant pitch pine (P. rigida) to successfully reestablish. On sites, pine accounted for 25% of pretreatment stem density, but <1% and 2% in the first and fourth growing seasons after burning, respectively. However, in year 1, pines had increased in density 20-fold compared to pretreatment levels, and by year 4, had maintained a 17-fold increase compared to pretreatment. The use of fire in forest management has been the subject of considerable criticism. In light of current public concerns over the loss of critical or unique habitats, fire may gain public support for use as a restoration tool.
Location(s), Described: Blazed Creek.
Location(s), Download GPS: ArcView Shape Files (shp.):  Decimal Degrees | UTM, NAD83, Zone 17 
Location(s), Online Map(s): Online Map
Methods/Experimental Design: Herbaceous plots were one square meter each.
Sampling Frequency: Variable.
Data Columns:

site - coded variable for sampling site
plot - plot number
hsplot - herbaceous subplot
species - herbaceous species name
density - number of herbaceous species per square meter plot
percent_cover - percent of square meter plot covered by herbaceous species


Missing Data Codes:
-9999

Site number=1=Blazed Creek

Publications:

Elliott, K.J., J.M. Vose, B.D. Clinton. 2002. Growth of eastern white pine (Pinus strobes L.) related to forest floor consumption by prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 26(1): 18-25.

Clinton, B.D., J.M. Vose, W.T. Swank. 1996. Shifts in aboveground and forest floor carbon and nitrogen pools after felling and burning in the southern Appalachians. Forest Science 42(4):431-441

Clinton, B.C., J.M. Vose. 2000. Plant succession and community restoration following felling and burning in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Pages 22-29 in W. Keith Moser and Cynthia F. Moser (eds.). Fire and Forest Ecology: innovative silviculture and vegetable management. Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference Proceedings, No.21. Tall Timbers Research Station, Talahassee, Florida, USA.

Vose. J.M., B.D. Clinton, W.T. Swank. 1993. Fire, drought, and forest management influences on pine/hardwood ecosystems in the southern Appalachians. 12th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, Oct. 26-28, Jekyll Island, Georgia, USA.

Vose, J.M., B.D. Clinton, W.T. Swank. 1993. Site preparation burning to restore pine-hardwood stands: aboveground biomass, forest floor mass, nitrogen carbon pools. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:2255-2262.

Data Restrictions: Users must adhere to the Coweeta LTER Data Policy.
Metadata: EML Format (XML Schema) | Information about EML
Data Downloads: Microsoft® Excel (.xls)
Text Comma Delimited (.csv)
DBase (.dbf)