Study Number: 

1034

Project Title:

Gap soil moisture.

Investigator(s):

Barry Clinton  E-Mail | Tel. 828.524.2128 x124 | Biographical Sketch
Affiliated Institution(s): USDA Forest Service
Address: Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory
3160 Coweeta Lab Road
Otto, North Carolina 28763  USA
Study Type: Terrestrial
Project Type: Coweeta Core Research
Study Period:

06/1993-06/1996

Status/Notes:

Type 1

Funding Sources:

National Science Foundation, DEB-9632854 (Text Version) and DEB-0218001 (Text Version) to Coweeta LTER.

Abstract: Small canopy openings often alter understory microclimate, leading to changes in forest structure and composition. It is generally accepted that physical changes in the understory (i.e., microclimatic) due to canopy removal drive changes in basic forest processes, particularly seedling recruitment which is intrinsically linked to soil moisture availability, light and, to a lesser extent, temperature. We examined the impact of small canopy gaps of the type (snags) and size (~300 m2) most frequently observed in the southern Appalachians on the understory microclimate. We created artificial canopy gaps at two elevations (a.m.s.l.) by girdling trees in areas with and without a Rhododendron maximum L. (rosebay rhododendron) understory. Soil and air temperature (degrees C), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR; mmol m-2s-1), and volumetric soil water content (WC%) in the upper 15 cm of soil were measured along transects generally running north to south through each gap. Overall, PAR was substantially less in rhododendron gaps than in non-rhododendron gaps. We found a slight increase in PAR in non-rhododendron gaps during spring and summer compared to controls. Very little seasonal variation in PAR was observed in rhododendron gaps compared with non-rhododendron gaps. In general, %WC in rhododendron gaps was lower than in non-rhododendron gaps and less variable. We also found a gap response in incident PAR during the spring and summer seasons. There was no significant effect of gap creation on %WC, nor were there site (elevation) differences or effects due to the presence of rhododendron. Further, there was no significant gap effect on mean, maximum, or minimum soil and air temperature; however, there were significant effects from the presence of rhododendron and between sites for PAR and soil and air temperature during certain seasons of the year. Although there is some certainty about measurable responses in key microclimatic variables in rhododendron and non-rhododendron gaps found in this study, we could not be certain if responses represent a significant enough departure from values in undisturbed conditions to elicit a tree recruitment response. Our results indicate that for openings of the size examined here, topography and evergreen understory are the primary determinants of spatial and temporal heterogeneity in understory microclimate.


Resources for students about terms used in this study:
Succession in canopy gaps - Source: Coweeta LTER
Environmental heterogeneity-tree gaps research - Source: Coweeta LTER
Rhododendron maximum - Source: USDA Plants Database
Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) - Source: Old Dominion University
Location(s), Described: Watershed 18 and Watershed 27.
Location(s), Download GPS: ArcView Shape Files (shp.):  UTM, NAD83, Zone 17 Lat/Lon
Location(s), Online Maps: Online Map
Methods/Experimental Design: Transects 40 m in length were established within each canopy gap in an approximate north/south direction. Gap edge was approximately 10m from gap center. Both ends of the transects were well outside the artificial gap and were used as controls. We installed Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) rods to a depth of 15 cm (rooting zone) at each thermocouple location for periodic measurement of volumetric soil moisture content.

Site IDs:
1 Lower Site 
2 Upper Site

Plot IDs:
1 Lower Non-Rhododendron 1
2 Lower Non-Rhododendron 2
3 Lower Non-Rhododendron 3
4 Lower Rhododendron
5 Upper Non-Rhododendron 1
6 Upper Non-Rhododendron 2
7 Upper Non-Rhododendron 3
8 Upper Rhododendron

Sampling Frequency: Approximately monthly throughout the growing season.
Data Columns: Site - Site ID where measure was conducted.  Site IDs are defined in Methods/Experimental Design.
Year - Year of the measurement
JDate - Julian Day of the measurement
Plot - Plot ID where measure was conducted. Plot IDs are defined in Methods/Experimental Design.
Loc - Location within plot
Perc_Water - percent volumetric soil water content (WC%)

Missing Data Codes:  . (Period)
Publications:

Clinton, Barton, D. 2003. Light, temperature, and soil moisture responses to elevation, evergreen understory, and small canopy gaps in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management. 186(1-3): 243-255.

Clinton, B. D., L. R. Boring, and W. T. Swank. 1994. Regeneration patterns in canopy gaps of mixed-oak forests of the southern Appalachians: influences of topographic position and evergreen understory. American Midland Naturalist 132: 308-319.

Clinton, B., L.R. Boring. 1993. Characteristics of canopy gaps and drought influences in oak forests of the Coweeta Basin. Ecology 74(5): 1551-1558.

Additional publications and research data from investigator(s) of this study:
Clinton - Global search

Data Restrictions: Users must adhere to the Coweeta LTER Data Policy.
Metadata: EML Format (XML Schema) | Information about EML
Data Downloads:   Microsoft® Excel (.xls)
Text Comma Delimited (.csv)
DBase (.dbf)