Study Number: 

1010

Project Title:

Cross-site decomposition of leaf litter in terrestrial and aquatic habitats, CWT and LUQ, 2000.

Investigator(s):

David C. Coleman  Biographical Sketch  (Retired)
Mark D. Hunter  Biographical Sketch  (Retired)
Catherine Pringle  E-Mail | Tel. 706.542.4289 | Biographical Sketch
Sina Adl
Affiliated Institution(s): University of Georgia
Address: University of Georgia
Ecology Annex
Athens Georgia 30602-2360  USA
Study Type: Terrestrial
Project Type: Coweeta Core Research
Study Period:

01/2000 - 01/2002

Status/Notes:

Type 1

Funding Sources:

National Science Foundation, DEB-9632854 (Text Version) and DEB-0218001 (Text Version) to Coweeta LTER.

Abstract: Comparison of decomposition and nutrient losses from three species of leaf litter in terrestrial and aquatic habitats at CWT and LUQ LTER sites. Overall hypothesis is that macro-consumers have different patterns and impacts on decomposition rates than microbial decomposers, and that these patterns are magnified in litters of low vs. high qualities over the two years of the experiment.


Resources for students about terms used in this study:
Decomposers: Source: Worsley School
Luquillo LTER: Source: Luquillo LTER
Location(s), Described: Lower part of Watershed 18; aquatic site to be determined at a later date.
Location(s), Download GPS: ArcView Shape Files (shp.) UTM, NAD83, Zone 17 | Lat/Lon
Location(s), Online Map(s): USGS Topographic-based Maps of Research Sites
(Printable for fieldwork)
Methods/Experimental Design: Triplicate plots set out with three species of litter, confined in 1 mm mesh litter bags and a similar set fully accessible, held together with plastic binder clips. Each bag of bundle will be marked with pink plastic marker flags.
Sampling Frequency: Every 6 weeks initially, then every 3 months as study progresses.
Data Columns: date - Date sample was collected; (1 = April 17 2000, 2 = July 17 2000, 3 = October 16 2000, 4 = January 24 2001)
site - Type of site where sample was collected; (1 = riparian, 2 = upland )
mesh - Type of mesh used in data collection; (1=coarse, 2=fine mesh)
species - Species codes
code - Sample codes
rep - Replicate number ranging from 1 to 3
weight - Weight of the sample; grams (g)
Colembola - Number of colembola specimens in sample
Oribatids - Number of oribatids specimens in sample
Immatures - Number of inmatures specimens in sample
Mesostigs - Number of mesostigs specimens in sample
Prostigs - Number of prostigs specimens in sample
CT -  Relative concentrations condensed tannin
HT -  Relative concentrations hydrolysable tannin
TP -  Relative concentrations total phenolics
N - Percent of Nitrogen
C - Percent of Carbon
CN - Carbon/Nitrogen ratio
LIG - Percent of Lignin
CELL - Percent of Cellulose
HEMI - Percent of Hemicellulose

File 1:

Species codes:
Species 1 = Buchenavia capitata
Species 2 = Dacryodes excelsa
Species 3 = Guarea guidonia
Species 4 = Quercus prinus

Sample codes:
BC = 1 = Buchenavia capitata
DE =
2 = Dacryodes excelsa
GG = 3 = Guarea guidonia
QP = 4 = Quercus prinus

File 2:
Species codes:
Species 1 = Liriodendron tulipifera
Species 2 = Quercus prinus
Species 3 = Rhododendron maximum

Sample codes:
LT = 1 = Liriodendron tulipifera
QP = 2 = Quercus prinus
RM = 3 = Rhododendron maximum 


Missing Data Codes: . (Period)
Publications:

Hunter, Mark D.; Adl, Sina; Pringle, Catherine M.; Coleman, David C. 2003. Relative effects of macroinvertebrates and habit on the chemistry of litter during decomposition.  Pedobiologia. 47: 101-115.

Data Restrictions: Users must adhere to the Coweeta LTER Data Policy.
Metadata: EML Format (XML Schema) | Information about EML
Data Downloads: File 1:
Microsoft® Excel (.xls) | Text Comma Delimited (.csv) | DBase (.dbf)

File 2:
Microsoft
® Excel (.xls)
| Text Comma Delimited (.csv) | DBase (.dbf)