Download Digital Orthophotos

What is a DOQ (Digital Orthophoto)?

An aerial photograph and an orthophoto or orthoimage may look alike but there are several important differences that allow an orthophoto to be used like a map. A conventional perspective aerial photograph contains image distortions caused by the tilting of the camera and terrain relief (topography). It does not have a uniform scale. You cannot measure distances on an aerial photograph like you can on a map. An aerial photo is not a map. The effects of tilt and relief are removed from the aerial photograph by a mathematical process called rectification. An orthophoto is a uniform-scale image. Since an orthophoto has a uniform scale, it is possible to measure directly on it like other maps. An orthophoto may serve as a base map onto which other map information may be overlaid (courtesy USGS).



Helpful links:  USGS Digital Orthophoto Program

What formats does Coweeta LTER offer?
Files are offered in Lizardtech's Mr. Sid file format, which is directly readable (no import required) in both ERDAS IMAGINE and ESRI ArcMap.  Mr. Sid file format is based upon an advanced compression algorithm that allows us to serve data online with virtually a lossless compression.  Each file has been reduced from 45Mb to approximately 3Mb. 

More information about Mr. Sid:  Lizardtech | Lossy vs. Lossless Compression

Are files georeferenced? Yes.
What projection is the data provided in?
All files are provided in Universal Tranverse Mercator (UTM), NAD83, Zone 17. 

What is the resolution of the DOQs?  1 meters per pixel.
What is the size of each DOQ? Coweeta offers 3.75-minute (quarter-quad) DOQs cover an area measuring 3.75-minutes longitude by 3.75-minutes latitude.

What if I need more assistance?
Contact us:  Email | Tel. 706.542.5691.

Copyright. Coweeta LTER. All rights reserved.

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreements
(DEB-9632854 & DEB-
0218001). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material
are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.